Text
What is different about Google Buzz.
Facebook
Twitter
Email
I think I just found the “killer feature” of google buzz, and I’m going to enjoy it.
Notice a couple of things from that pic.
- It was originally a tweet
- It has the conversation in one page (as opposed to twitter
- It is linking the following people an ex-coworker and good friend, a current coworker, someone from my university and someone I know from open source
- we are on topic, something specific
- I was able to reply to everyone in one blip(?) how you call them in buzz?
So how this compares to other engines?
- it has the same conversation flow
- But due to it’s closed nature I am not broadcasting
- My personal rule of facebook is that I need to know you in person to get you
- It has this pesky “registration” where we need to agree to be “friends”.
- It lacks the real time engine
- It lacks the conversation view, some clients have it but it’s a hack rather than a feature, for those interested you basically need to walk the tree from the bottom up essentially making it very hard to build the full tree unless you have all the leafs.
- Twitter netiquette implies you don’t spam your followers with things they don’t really care about so long conversations then to piss everyone not involved off
- You get to keep all your conversations
- You don’t get the 100’s of > which makes long conversations hard to follow
- You don’t have to remember to hit reply all
- Don’t need to choose a priori who is interested in your input.
All in all I’m really enjoying this. I think It’s a keeper.